Īthol's Sentinel Elm Farm seems to be the source for the name Sentinel Hill. Burleson points out that several names included in the story-including Bishop, Frye, Sawyer, Rice and Morgan-are either prominent Athol names or have a connection to the town's history. It has been suggested that the name "Dunwich" was inspired by the town of Greenwich, which was deliberately flooded to create the Quabbin Reservoir, although Greenwich and the nearby towns of Dana, Enfield and Prescott actually weren't submerged until 1938. Researchers have pointed out the story's apparent connections to another Massachusetts region: the area around Athol and points south, in the north-central part of the state (which is where Lovecraft indicates that Dunwich is located). The physical model for Dunwich's Sentinel Hill is thought to be Wilbraham Mountain near Wilbraham. ~ HPL , letter from Lovecraft to Zealia Bishop, EXP: Robert M. When the road dips again there are stretches of marshland that one instinctively dislikes, and indeed almost fears at evening when unseen whippoorwills chatter and the fireflies come out in abnormal profusion to dance to the raucous, creepily insistent rhythms of stridently piping bullfrogs. It is noted that "much of the physical description of the Dunwich countryside is a faithful sketch of Wilbraham:" ( EXP: The Dunwich Horror and Others)ĭunwich is "a vague echo of the decadent Massachusetts countryside around Springfield - say Wilbraham, Monson and Hampden." ( HPL: Selected Letters 3.508) One such legend is the notion that whippoorwills can capture the departing soul. ( HPL: letter to August Derleth, August 4, 1928, EXP: The Dunwich Horror and Others) "Reboot" should tell you that the creators are taking the series in a new direction.The action "takes place amongst the wild domed hills of the upper Miskatonic Valley, far northwest of Arkham, and is based on several old New England legends - one of which I heard only last month during my sojourn in Wilbraham," a town east of Springfield. A sequel is supposed to continue the prior film's style and continuity for the most part. A remake is intended to be a standalone product usually. A film being a "reboot" should tell you something that "sequel" and "remake" don't. It rose in prominence around 2005, and while some take it as exclusively "discarding continuity and starting over", there's no hard rule that says that must happen for something to be a reboot. That's because the term was not formally defined at any point. Terminator Salvation was a reboot despite having headline continuity with the preceding films, for example.Ī note: You'll find conflicting information on what the term means. The reason you see the term used so widely is because you probably assumed it meant the same as "remake", but a reboot implies a different story and usually continuity, though even that can vary, hense "hard reboot" and "soft reboot" being terms. Other reboots: Batman Begins, Casino Royale, Star Trek 2009. The thing that makes this a reboot is its branding being associated with the Universal films. Dracula Untold is, however, a reboot of sorts. Neither is Dracula 2000, since it has no relationship with the Universal Dracula films. A reboot is a new take on an existing franchise.įrom Dusk Til Dawn isn't an attempt to re-start the Dracula franchise. "Reboot" is an intellectual property term. "Humanity is sooo scared of the monsters, we should try something new and create a monster of our own to fight them!" I could see that happening thanks to lazy writing.ie. Someone in another thread said it'd probably be Mecha-Godzilla. We'll probably get a BvS fight where there's no reason to even fight (Godzilla has shown enough intelligence to understand good v bad monsters and Kong only fights threats to his home and it's inhabitants), but they do for whatever reason, they both get some good hits in, one is close to winning, then some other convenient threat forces them to work together to save Earth/humanity. If that happened no one is really going to rush out in 2023 or whenever to see the next Kong movie about the loser who got shit on by the giant lizard. Imagine if Kong (who is by all accounts ~1/2 tall at best, and probably 1/4 the mass at most) gets wrecked by Godzilla. No way they let either character "lose" (at least decidedly) because that'd kill the audiences interest in them.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |